A · Immediate repayment
Repay now
Pay the principal immediately; avoid future estimated interest.
- ↳ Certain payment · 100%
- Total cost $100,000.00
Amount paid now
$100,000.00
Services
Post-payment audit response and Medicare appeal support for wound-care providers facing overpayments, recoupments, contractor reviews, and ALJ-stage disputes.
Medicare appeal decision tool
Compare paying an overpayment demand now with appealing. Explore estimated interest, service fees, and potential savings using your own assumptions, then request a free review.
A post-payment Medicare audit can place months or years of wound care, multiple patients, and substantial reimbursement at risk. The defense must make a large and often fragmented clinical record understandable claim by claim.
Arclight combines wound-care operating experience, documentation analysis, Medicare policy, denial-rationale review, evidence mapping, appeal writing, and hearing preparation to build a coherent record from the audit response through the ALJ stage.
The result is a disciplined, adjudicator-ready presentation: patient timelines, wound-level evidence, issue maps, policy responses, exhibit packets, and hearing strategy built around the facts that decide the case.
Wound-care documentation services
Address stale carryover, contradictions, and unsupported findings with template work led by an advanced practice provider: a clinical nurse specialist with years of experience in wound care. EMR vendor coordination, training, and post-implementation chart checks support corrective action.
Arclight Access offers Product Only, Prepayment Reimbursement Support Only, and a Complete Program that combines separately priced product and support components.
What could fighting the demand be worth to you? Enter the amount due, an appeal fee or quote you have received, and your assumed chance of full relief. Compare potential savings after fees with repaying now or another appeal option.
This is not an Arclight Action quote. These scenario estimates help you explore the economics; they do not assess your case or predict an individual judge's decision.
$1–$100 million. Commas and cents are accepted.
Annual percentage; 10% is a planning assumption.
Planning timeline estimate; not a minimum or guaranteed timeline.
Assumed probability of full relief by the end of the appeal through ALJ, based on documentation and quality of your representation.
Mixed scenario; meaningful evidence with substantial uncertainty.
These are hypothetical scenario descriptions, not validated probability estimates. Buying junior, experienced, or specialized support does not establish a success rate.
For a more custom estimate, please reach out to info@arclightaction.com.
Enter the total fixed fee for all appeal levels through ALJ, including redetermination, Qualified Independent Contractor (QIC) reconsideration, and Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) representation. The fee is paid whether the appeal wins or loses. This is not an Arclight quote. Use fees or quotes you’ve received elsewhere to see the value to you.
A second appeal service, separate from repaying now. Both appeals use the same interest rate and resolution period.
Your estimated savings
$39,166.67
After your appeal fee, compared with paying the demand now. The estimate accounts for both winning and losing using the chance of winning you selected.
Under these assumptions, appealing comes out ahead on average.
This is not an Arclight Action quote.
At the break-even fee, your estimated savings are $0. Pay less and the difference stays with you; pay more and, under these assumptions, it makes more financial sense to repay the demand. This is a scenario calculation, not a quote or a market price.
Documentation, the appeal stage, and the specific issues matter. Request a free review to discuss your situation.
No contact details are needed to use this calculator. Sharing the scenario is optional.
Start with a $100,000.00 demand. The appeal fee is paid whether you win or lose. Each branch shows what that outcome could cost after 8 months.
Win probabilities are assumptions, not predictions. A full loss includes the demand, estimated interest, and appeal fee.
A · Immediate repayment
Pay the principal immediately; avoid future estimated interest.
Amount paid now
$100,000.00
B · Alternative appeal
Enable the comparison to model a second fee and assumed probability. This is a separate appeal option.
C · Appeal option
Appeal service fee
$7,500.00
Fixed fee, paid whether you win or lose
This is not an Arclight Action quote.
| Total cost / value | A · Repay now | C · Proposed appeal |
|---|---|---|
| Appeal service fee | $0.00 | $7,500.00 |
| If you win in full | $100,000.00 | $7,500.00 |
| If you lose in full | $100,000.00 | $114,166.67 |
| Estimated savings vs. paying now | $0.00 | $39,166.67 |
Win and loss amounts include the appeal fee. Repaying now has one certain cost. Estimated savings account for both outcomes; actual results may differ.
For this comparison, we combine what you would pay if you win with what you would pay if you lose, using your selected chance of each outcome. The figures below are averages for planning, not appeal fees or bills you would receive.
These figures help you compare options using your own assumptions. Your actual costs depend on the outcome of your appeal.
Estimated simple interest = demand × annual rate × months ÷ 12. The projected balance adds that interest to the demand. Expected appeal cost = fixed fee + probability of full loss × projected balance. Expected savings subtract that cost from the demand paid today.
The fee ceiling versus repaying now is demand − probability of full loss × projected balance. With another appeal service, its fee + probability difference × projected balance gives a second ceiling. The relevant ceiling is the lower of the two, so the proposed fee must leave value against both comparisons.
Review wound measurements, photographs, debridement history, conservative care, treatment progression, vascular status, offloading, orders, product use, and medical necessity support.
Build patient-specific and product-specific support around wound type, failed conservative care, product identification, graft sizing, orders, photographs, and treatment response.
Map contractor rationales against the record, Medicare policy, claim facts, and available evidence, including rationale drift across appeal stages.
Build patient timelines, wound-level summaries, claim maps, outcomes evidence, issue matrices, and adjudicator-ready exhibits.
Prepare redetermination, reconsideration, and ALJ submissions with issue-by-issue responses, supporting evidence, and organized exhibits.
Develop the hearing theory, exhibit index, testimony plan, patient-level defense packets, and concise presentation for the ALJ hearing.
These options describe the scope of support. Request a case review to discuss your needs. Use the calculator above to evaluate a fee or quote you have received and compare what is included through each appeal level.
Review the audit scope, documentation risk, denial theory, missing-record needs, deadlines, and recommended defense strategy.
Build patient summaries, issue-by-issue responses, exhibit organization, documentation analysis, policy support, and appeal materials.
Develop the full case strategy, hearing brief, exhibit index, witness preparation, patient-level packets, policy exhibits, and hearing presentation.
Work alongside healthcare counsel so specialized record, clinical, and policy development is handled efficiently while counsel addresses targeted legal issues.
Review the contractor, procedural stage, deadlines, claim universe, and asserted denial rationale.
Build the patient, wound, claim, product, and documentation structure needed to analyze the case.
Compare each rationale against the record, Medicare policy, claim facts, and available evidence.
Develop the narrative, patient summaries, issue responses, exhibit list, and supporting evidence.
Prepare the provider and record for the next appeal stage and present the case at the ALJ hearing.
Post-payment audit response and Medicare appeal support for wound-care providers facing overpayments, recoupments, contractor reviews, and ALJ-stage disputes.